This could also read: PE hurts out kids; small desks hurt our kids; fluorescent lights
hurt our kids; paper cuts hurt our kids .
. . .
The causation fallacies known
as oversimplification and exaggeration occur whenever the series of actual
causes for an event are either reduced or multiplied to the point where there
is no longer a genuine, causal connection between the alleged causes and the
actual effect. In other words, multiple causes are reduced to just one or a few
(oversimplification) or a couple of causes are multiplied into many
(exaggeration).
Also known as the
"reductive fallacy" because it involves reducing the number of
causes, oversimplification seems to occur more often, perhaps because there are
so many ostensibly good reasons for simplifying things. Well-intentioned
writers and speakers can readily fall into the trap of oversimplification if
they are not careful.
One impetus for
simplification is the basic advice given to all who want to improve their
writing style: don't get bogged down in details. Good writing needs to be clear
and precise, thus helping people to understand an issue rather than confusing
them even more. In the process, however, a writer can easily leave out too
many details, omitting critical information which needs to be included.
Example: The
nation's current lack of moral standards was caused by the poor example set by
Bill Clinton when he was president. Granted,
Clinton may not
have set the best example imaginable, but it isn't reasonable to argue that his
example is responsible for the morality of the entire nation. Once again, there
is a wide variety of different factors which can influence the morality of
individuals and groups.
No comments:
Post a Comment